A BCQ Ride by Chris Jeggo

The 7th of November turned out to be a fine autumn day, far pleasanter than the immediately preceding wet Wednesday, which was better spent catching up with admin chores, giving the mid-week club ride a miss.  I decided to visit three more BCQ locations.

The British Cycle Quest is run by the CTC as a challenge for cycletourists.  There are six places to visit in each county in the UK, with a question to answer at each.  If you submit your answers on official forms you can win certificates, medals and trophies, if that turns you on.  Not me.  However, the checkpoints have been chosen to be in interesting places, in good cycling areas, so I have found them to be an inspiration for bike rides that take me to locations which I would probably not have visited otherwise but which turned out to be worth visiting.

Having already ‘collected’ just about all the checkpoints that can be reached in a day ride from home, I loaded the bike into the car and drove to Whitchurch in the Test Valley, only fifty minutes via M3, A303 and A34.

My first objective was Walbury Hill on the chalk ridge, so I set off through the lanes to St Mary Bourne.  Once Whitchurch and its noisy bypass were left behind, the peace of the countryside emphasised the lack of traffic and the smoothness of the road surfaces.

St Mary Bourne is a very pleasant village with a suitably imposing inn (The George) and church (of flint and stone and dating back at least 800 years).  It is a typical Hampshire village in other ways, containing a fair number of timber-framed cottages and of brick and flint cottages, a good few of them thatched.  I noticed that one timber-framed cottage had the framework filled in with alternating courses of brick and flint, a bit unusual but totally in keeping.  The village straddles its chalk stream, The Bourne Rivulet, and a B road, which was carrying very little traffic.

The latter took me three miles through stream-side pastures to the next village, Hurstbourne Tarrant, where I turned right on to the A343 for less than half a mile before forking left into another lane.  This time I was climbing, almost imperceptibly, a dry valley, through deciduous and mixed woodland where the valley was narrower, and spacious undulating arable fields where the valley broadened and had side branches.  Pheasants were everywhere.  The road started to tilt seriously upwards just before I reached Combe Manor, and at this point I realised that I had only encountered one other moving vehicle in the last five miles, and that was a road bike piloted by an attractive young blonde.

>From Combe it’s a short, steady low-gear climb to the top, where the BCQ-er has to avoid ‘falling off the edge’ as the road immediately plunges even more steeply down the scarp slope of the downs.  The immense rolling panorama to the north appears so rapidly during the last few yards of the ascent as to cause an intake of breath.  Vast acres of Berkshire, Wiltshire and Oxfordshire are spread out beneath you.  The next great chalk ridge, the one carrying the Ridgeway, can be seen a good few leagues distant.  Closer, a few miles away, the Kennet valley, where the next objective is to be found, is easily picked out.  For the present objective one must turn right for a side road and the Walbury Hill car park.  And there is the monument commemorating army rehearsals which took place on the lands at my feet in the weeks leading up to D-Day.

Details noted, it was down, down, down through Inkpen, down nearly all the way to Hungerford Common, an extensive, open, grassy area adorned with several avenues.  Grazing animals were contentedly lunching, for, yes, it was indeed lunch-time, but mine had to wait until I had answered the second question, cycling away from the eateries of Hungerford to the newest avenue, of copper beeches, planted to celebrate the Millenium, or ‘Minnellium’, as Victoria Wood called it in ‘Dinnerladies’.

Whatever made me think of dinner?  I hastened to the canal bridge at the foot of Hungerford High Street, where the Tutti Pole Cafe is to be found and can be relied upon to serve good food at a reasonable price.  I have eaten there a few times over the years, and it is mentioned on quite a few cycling club websites.

Re-fuelled, I set off up the Kennet valley towards the third BCQ checkpoint in Ramsbury, taking the direct route as I was beginning to wonder whether I would get back to Whitchurch before sunset.  The B4192 to and through Chilton Foliat was undergoing re-surfacing, and had been planed, but, as you will know, this is not planing as a wood-worker would know it.  That made my fillings rattle a bit, but at least the road was not closed, which might have happened had my timing been different, according to a few yellow road signs scattered about the area.  Ramsbury, three miles further on, is another attractive village with a decidedly traditional feel to it.  I answered the question, took a few photos, and started my return journey.

Cycle Route 20 to Froxfield starts up a 17% hill, which was manageable as the traffic had cleared a strip of tarmac amidst all the wet fallen leaves.  The descent to Froxfield gives good views of the Bath Road heading towards Savernake Forest and Marlborough.  It was a bit busy, but it is no longer a primary route since the M4 runs parallel.  It is in fact a very pleasant road to cycle along when the traffic is really light, e.g. before breakfast time on a summer morning.  Cycle Route 20 continued out of Froxfield up another ‘single-arrow’ hill, but not so steep nor so long as the previous one.

From Little Bedwyn to Great Bedwyn the route runs parallel to the Kennet and Avon canal.  A couple of miles further on can be found the Crofton Beam Engines, one of which is an 1812 original by Boulton and Watt.  They pump water from reliable local sources to the canal’s summit level a mile further west.  Where the canal goes, the railway follows, and so does cycle Route 20, but not I.  My direct route left the valley at Great Bedwyn to re-cross the chalk ridge to Oxenwood, and then down the valley through Vernham Dean and Upton back to Hurstbourne Tarrant.

Sunset found me near St Mary Bourne, so the lamps and reflective stuff came out of the saddlebag for the last few miles.  The end of a memorable cycling day out.

7.11.13

Bob Macleod in his “Budgie Smugglers”

Laurie Mutch writes:
 
Bob apparently leapt out of the house on Wednesday morning in a hurry only to discover that he had grabbed completely inappropriate clothing for a wet ride (or perhaps very appropriate as a swimming costume). He then had a choice of returning home to face his wife or the amusement of his fellow cyclists.

On arrival, his cycling “friends” absolutely collapsed in laughter – especially given the white gap between his summer tanned legs and the budgie smugglers.

Surrey Cycling Strategy Consultation ~ Read all about it!


  Five CTC members attended the once in a decade live Surrey Cycling Debate at Surrey UniversityUnfortunately little of the discussion was on Surrey’s Cycling Strategy. Concerns were expressed by Surrey residents about the behaviour of cyclists and the number of cycling events in the County and their impact on access and business. Both the police and residents spoke about poorly supervised and undisciplined sportives. In many respects a lost opportunity to debate the strategy and develop common ground.

Over the past month the Surrey Cycling Strategy Consultation has been taking place. Your committee has made an official response, as has Guildford’s Cycling Forum. Keith Chesterton, who some of you will know, has been keeping some of us in the loop with information.  There follow some links and copies of emails which will, I hope, put anyone wishing to learn more, in the picture as far as the current status quo is concerned.

Email from Keith on 1 November

I attach draft minutes of the last meeting. Please advise me of any alterations needed.
As agreed then, I have arranged another meeting primarily to agree our response to the GBC consultation on transport issues for the Local Plan. (We normally have meetings about every 3 months.)
Owing to GBC staff holidays I arranged it for 6pm on Tuesday Nov 19th. I hope you can make it,
Please let me know if you cannot & if so alternative dates
It might be possible to rearrange but it would  need to be before Nov 26th.
Note the Local Plan can be found on www.guildfordlocalplan.info
Transport starts on page 33 of the Local Plan Strategy Issues & Sites document, where cycling & walking are dealt with briefly.
It is important that you read this section before the meeting.
If you can’t come, please send me points before the meeting.
Keith Chesterton

Note: the meeting date has subsequently changed to Monday, as shown below:

PLEASE NOTE – We have changed the date. It is now MONDAY NOVEMBER 18th (& NOT Tues 19th) We changed owing to a number not being able to make the Tuesday.
The Meeting will be at 6pm in the Council Chamber at Guildford Borough Council – we will occupy a small part of this.
Please let me know whether you can come on this revised date.
I attach draft minutes of the last meeting (circ previously). Please advise me of any alterations needed.

This meeting is primarily to agree our response to the GBC consultation on transport issues for the Local Plan. (We normally have meetings about every 3 months.)

Note the Local Plan can be found on www.guildfordlocalplan.info

Transport starts on page 33 of the Local Plan Strategy Issues & Sites document, where cycling & walking are dealt with briefly.

It is important that you read this section before the meeting.

If you can’t come, please send me points before the meeting.
3 points we will probably want to make are:
1. We support the Plan’s focus on sustainable transport, esp cycling
2. For cycling to increase significantly, Guildford needs  continuous safe routes for cycling across the borough
3. Developments, especially in the town centre, should incorporate safe routes for cycling, lightly trafficed or traffic free. The should NOT, as many previous planned developments in Guildford have done, push cyclists onto busy main roads
Keith Chesterton

The link to the minutes of the Forum meeting dated 22 October may be found on the West Surrey website under ‘Downloads’.

Responses to the Plan may also be found on the West Surrey website under ‘Downloads’. *

*Please note that these documents are exactly what was sent out. I’m not convinced the titles correspond to the content exactly, but fathoming it all out seems very complicated.

Our Committee’s formal response to the Surrey Cycling Strategy may be found on the West Surrey website under ‘Downloads’.

Do be aware that the meeting to discuss these responses is on Monday 18 November. Member Dave Sharpington comments:

Hi Keith

Sorry again, but I am away over this long w/e. I support your statements but would make some additional points as below:

 1. Whilst narrow the towpath is increasingly used to avoid the gyratory. Further improvements to the surface would not cost much and take much traffic off road. A ramp to the bridge at Dapdune, and widening of the path onward east to Woodbridge road would also help.

2. I believe the A3 underpass with the Wey at the Woodbridge site to be a very economic option and was pleased to have support from Chris Peck,CTC and John Gibson,NT. I do not understand the lack of enthusiasm elsewhere.

3. NCN 22 – The Mount remains dangerous. The descent to the junction with the Portsmouth Rd places a great reliance on brakes, and could be the site of a serious accident. The alternative used during the Sustrans trial event (turn right toward Upper Guildown Road before the descent) remains a good alternative, but would need the off road track status changed (it already has a good wide surface)

Keith makes the following comments:

The main purpose of the meeting is to agree our response to Guildford’s consultation on its Local Plan.

Additionally, Dave Sharpington will bring a set of A3 copies of the town centre so everyone has them, so it’s a point of reference without going through them in detail.

He’ll also bring along some cycle guides so we have some maps of the whole Borough.

He will  also put on the maps his suggestions for routes so far. People can then take the maps away, add their own ideas and bring them back the next time the Forum meets, when we’ll collate them on to one big map.

Keith
Remember 6pm on Monday in Council Chamber

Surrey Cycling Strategy Consultation ~ Read all about it!

  Five CTC members attended the once in a decade live Surrey Cycling Debate at Surrey UniversityUnfortunately little of the discussion was on Surrey’s Cycling Strategy. Concerns were expressed by Surrey residents about the behaviour of cyclists and the number of cycling events in the County and their impact on access and business. Both the police and residents spoke about poorly supervised and undisciplined sportives. In many respects a lost opportunity to debate the strategy and develop common ground.

Over the past month the Surrey Cycling Strategy Consultation has been taking place. Your committee has made an official response, as has Guildford’s Cycling Forum. Keith Chesterton, who some of you will know, has been keeping some of us in the loop with information.  There follow some links and copies of emails which will, I hope, put anyone wishing to learn more, in the picture as far as the current status quo is concerned.

Email from Keith on 1 November

I attach draft minutes of the last meeting. Please advise me of any alterations needed.
As agreed then, I have arranged another meeting primarily to agree our response to the GBC consultation on transport issues for the Local Plan. (We normally have meetings about every 3 months.)
Owing to GBC staff holidays I arranged it for 6pm on Tuesday Nov 19th. I hope you can make it,
Please let me know if you cannot & if so alternative dates
It might be possible to rearrange but it would  need to be before Nov 26th.
Note the Local Plan can be found on www.guildfordlocalplan.info
Transport starts on page 33 of the Local Plan Strategy Issues & Sites document, where cycling & walking are dealt with briefly.
It is important that you read this section before the meeting.
If you can’t come, please send me points before the meeting.
Keith Chesterton

Note: the meeting date has subsequently changed to Monday, as shown below:

PLEASE NOTE – We have changed the date. It is now MONDAY NOVEMBER 18th (& NOT Tues 19th) We changed owing to a number not being able to make the Tuesday.
The Meeting will be at 6pm in the Council Chamber at Guildford Borough Council – we will occupy a small part of this.
Please let me know whether you can come on this revised date.
I attach draft minutes of the last meeting (circ previously). Please advise me of any alterations needed.
This meeting is primarily to agree our response to the GBC consultation on transport issues for the Local Plan. (We normally have meetings about every 3 months.)
Note the Local Plan can be found on www.guildfordlocalplan.info
Transport starts on page 33 of the Local Plan Strategy Issues & Sites document, where cycling & walking are dealt with briefly.
It is important that you read this section before the meeting.
If you can’t come, please send me points before the meeting.
3 points we will probably want to make are:
1. We support the Plan’s focus on sustainable transport, esp cycling
2. For cycling to increase significantly, Guildford needs  continuous safe routes for cycling across the borough
3. Developments, especially in the town centre, should incorporate safe routes for cycling, lightly trafficed or traffic free. The should NOT, as many previous planned developments in Guildford have done, push cyclists onto busy main roads
Keith Chesterton

The link to the minutes of the Forum meeting dated 22 October may be found on the West Surrey website under ‘Downloads’.

Responses to the Plan may also be found on the West Surrey website under ‘Downloads’. *

*Please note that these documents are exactly what was sent out. I’m not convinced the titles correspond to the content exactly, but fathoming it all out seems very complicated.

Our Committee’s formal response to the Surrey Cycling Strategy may be found on the West Surrey website under ‘Downloads’.

Do be aware that the meeting to discuss these responses is on Monday 18 November. Member Dave Sharpington comments:

Hi Keith
Sorry again, but I am away over this long w/e. I support your statements but would make some additional points as below:

 1. Whilst narrow the towpath is increasingly used to avoid the gyratory. Further improvements to the surface would not cost much and take much traffic off road. A ramp to the bridge at Dapdune, and widening of the path onward east to Woodbridge road would also help.

2. I believe the A3 underpass with the Wey at the Woodbridge site to be a very economic option and was pleased to have support from Chris Peck,CTC and John Gibson,NT. I do not understand the lack of enthusiasm elsewhere.
3. NCN 22 – The Mount remains dangerous. The descent to the junction with the Portsmouth Rd places a great reliance on brakes, and could be the site of a serious accident. The alternative used during the Sustrans trial event (turn right toward Upper Guildown Road before the descent) remains a good alternative, but would need the off road track status changed (it already has a good wide surface)

Keith makes the following comments:

The main purpose of the meeting is to agree our response to Guildford’s consultation on its Local Plan.

Additionally, Dave Sharpington will bring a set of A3 copies of the town centre so everyone has them, so it’s a point of reference without going through them in detail.

He’ll also bring along some cycle guides so we have some maps of the whole Borough.

He will  also put on the maps his suggestions for routes so far. People can then take the maps away, add their own ideas and bring them back the next time the Forum meets, when we’ll collate them on to one big map.

Keith
Remember 6pm on Monday in Council Chamber

Sunday Ride ~ 3 November 2013

Here we were in November, and still the weather was holding – more or less. The forecast hadn’t been good which probably resulted in the poor turn-out of four. We actually had just one small shower and the promised wind really wasn’t bad at all. The sun was low in the sky, which made the countryside look even more stunning than usual.

The route: http://www.strava.com/activities/92945071