Fellow West Surrey cyclists might be interested in the coming Guildford Travel Club meeting:-
My usual Saturday MTB ride became a mudfest at the weekend. We went along the Christmas pie trail, which is kind of sloppy muddy after any rain, so it was very sloppy. Just around Normandy, the bridlepath has been closed because Thames Water are doing something or other to the mains, meaning a longer and even more muddy detour. At Tongham we turned left, up to the Hog’s back, down towards Sands & back via Puttenham Common. Forget spending money on mudpacks etc, just go mountain biking on a wet day!
You’d think that after six weeks cycling in hilly Italy with a full touring load, I might just be fit and prepared for a good old thrash around the lanes of Surrey and Sussex. Well, you’d be wrong! I very nearly got off my bike and walked up the final hill I was so pooped! What is it about cycling that suggests that one almost seems to need to train specifically for individual disciplines. OK, so I’m not on the same bike, so my gears are nowhere near as low, plus I’ve actually not ridden my bike since getting back a fortnight ago, but really…. I thought a day out on the bike without luggage and on a lighter bike would be a walk in the park. It wasn’t!
But it was still great fun, helped by being in the best company, although our ranks were somewhat meagre – a mere four! It’s not surprising really when you see what the weather was like – and the photos have been enhanced! It was grey and damp and deeply autumnal and, to be honest, really rather lovely. Of course, the fact that it was warm made the day good for me, because I am not a lover of the cold. Warm, damp autumn days are very special and this was one of the best!
Clive’s knowledge of the local road network means that he’s usually able to come up with something new, and todays route to Midhurst was certainly that. I’d never before gone up the road from Thursley to reach the track round Devil’s PUnchbowl to reach Hindhead. And the roads south, passing through Hammer, Lynchmere, Redford and Woolbeding to Midhurst was pretty much all new to me too.
We partook of coffee and cake at the Cafe Verdi in Midhurst before making our way eastwards to RSPB Pulborough Brooks for further refreshments before our return home via Fittleworth and Plaistow.
Thanks to Clive for another good ride / route, to Nick and John for their company too, and finally to Heidi who shamed me into coming out on this ride and then didn’t turn out herself. There will be words spoken….
Detailed info on the route may be found by clicking here but here are the main stats with a map of the route:
Have your say or put up with what we get. Respond by 15th November.
We cycle to the shops, work and for fun, and we drive cars. Thus we are best placed to influence and inform the Guildford Borough Council and Surrey County Council where to spend identified funding.
There are three surveys that need your input, every input has equal weight so do not rely on others. Have your say:
www.travelsmartsurrey.info/guildford-consult is Guildford Borough Cycling Plan that flows down from the Surrey County Council Cycle Strategy – no funding yet
www.surreycc.gov.uk/guildfordtransportschemes walking, cycling and public transport pipeline – this has the most opportunity for funding, items should be implementable in the next 3 years and benefit commerce.
www.guildford.gov.uk/article/14930/Help-shape-the-future-of-Guildfords-Town-Centre – 30 year Guildford draft Town Centre Masterplan with little on cycling.
The Guildford Cycle Forum provided an input to the Guildford Borough Plan last year. It included some specific recommendations and an “affordable and immediately implementable higher level to the strategy” that is copied below.
As local tax payers and vehicle drivers, we suggested affordable but valuable improvements. They are:
a. Cycle lane entry to all Advanced Stop Boxes so that cyclists can get in to the box.
b. Continuous Cycle lanes, abrupt turns onto the pavement and cycle lane ends increase the risks to cyclists.
c. Give Cyclists Priority when insufficient room for car lane and cycle lane.
(i) Signage stating “No Overtaking of Cyclists” when road is narrow and shared.
(ii) “1.5m clear when overtaking Cyclists” signage where cycle lanes are next to traffic lanes.
d. Dedicate with signage more back roads to shared usage, allowing car access to housing but blocked to through traffic except walkers and cycles.
e. Maintaining and opening more alley ways and cycle short cuts away from cars.
f. Prioritise sweeping of cycle lanes.
g. Introduce contra-flow cycling on one- way streets with or without marked lanes.
h. Seal road repair edges with tar to prevent water ingress and pothole formation. Cycle wheels are narrow, and wide inline cracks are dangerous.
Specific GBC projects that the Guildford Cycle Forum supports include:
a) River Wey South and East bank from Bowers Lock/ Clay Lane A3100 to Bottom of the High Street
b) Open land South of the A3 from Clay Lane A3100 to Bottom of the High Street
c) Walnut Tree Close via rail bridge path and Stockton to the Lido, Stoke Park and Abbots Wood
d Walnut Tree Close via rail bridge path and Markenfield Road, Nightingale Road and South Stoke Park
e) A25 improvements as it has a lot of cyclists using the infrastructure that had been hard fought for but still needs improvement.
Cycling infrastructure should make cyclists feel safer and encouraged to cycle which would then increase the take up.
You can do this by:
- Responding to the consultations (at least the first two) by 15thNovember.
- Support the GuildfordCycle Forum, a few will collectively lead, but we need an army of cyclists to report problems and suggest improvements.